Garvey Problems

A lot of misinformation has been exchanged here and I hope I can make more sense out of it for everyone. First: "Balanced Literacy" has been around since the early 90's. It was designed as a balance between the two warring camps in reading/language arts - the "Whole Language" group and the "Phonics/Back to the Basics" group. The "experts" had been fighting for thirty years over which way was the best way to teach reading and writing. Many educators like myself were tired of the terrible "swings" between the two methods and we tried to make an amalgamation of both ideologies. Reading texts began using parts of the initiative twenty years ago.

Most comments here seem to think it is a form of curriculum - it simply is not! It is a group of teaching methods that texts give teachers to use with their classes. It certainly is not a state adopted curriculum but almost all elementary texts have elements of the program. Throughout the past 15 years, Garvey teachers have had CONTINUAL training in the use of these teaching methods (at least twice, since they have new texts every seven years). The problem arises when a superintendent states that NONE of the teachers are using the methodology. How was that evaluation of teachers arrived at? Ms. Johnson spent 3 -5 minutes in "...every classroom in the district..." at the beginning of the year! I have evaluated teachers and it is nearly impossible to get a clear picture of their methodology in that short of time. How do we know if they were even observed while teaching reading or writing?

Another misconception in this blog is the belief that our teachers are not using the state standards to design their lessons. This couldn't be further from the truth. 15 years ago this district began designing assessments for the state standards and designing a report card that reflected to the parents their child's success in passing the standards. In 2004 I took the material we developed to a statewide conference on the standards and people from all around California were amazed on what our district had done. Of course, as the standards change so will the assessments, but, to say our teachers do not know how to "unwrap the standards" is simply fantasy.

This battle in Garvey is not over the lack of direction in the district, it's about truth and candor. It's about how to treat and respect your professional employees. Its about the definition of "change". What do the commentators mean when they say Garvey needs to change? What is their vision of the district to be? Change for the purpose of change brings chaos.

In my opinion, in the past eight years our teachers have made terrific strides in meeting the needs of their students. Garvey has continually been on the cusp of "change" - Standards Based Assessments, Response to Intervention, Professional Learning Communities, The Leader in Me, Wellness ... the list goes on and on. The "changes" we've experienced in the past two years are a regression to failed policies and methodologies.

Many of the complaints I have read here seem to me to be personal vendettas against certain unnamed teachers. Many of the "changes" discussed here - and implemented by the superintendent - are, in reality, falling back on the failed policies of the past: unwarranted demands from administrators, punishment if every dictum is not followed, blanket condemnation of every past practice in the district, downgrading the skills of EVERY teacher. This sort of BULLYING has to stop if our district wants to survive!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Thank you Mr. Bruesch for saying something.

I was wondering if you would. My parents, neighbors and I myself have been supporters of your for many years. We have a couple of young kids in Garvey now, I don’t know if I agree with you all the way honestly. I don’t have all of the particulars.

I however do have concerns with Ted and the things that United Garvey Parents group are saying. I know you know Ted because he’s knocked on my door for you in the pass elections.

I’ve heard from a few parents who want to tell you to tell Ted to stop mistreating Janet Chin in public. It has been an embarrassment to our district and must really be stopped. Honestly the situation doesn’t appear to be crucial as losing teachers in the classroom.

We’ve seen Janet sits there and says nothing while Ted passes out papers and humiliate her to audience member.

We voted for Janet Chin just like we voted for you.

My children attended the summer school math program at Garvey school last year and the summer afterschool program Janet Chin did. It was outstanding the level of care they took with the kids and getting the teenagers involved. My kids really loved it and wanted to go back this summer if they do it.

We also referred other parents during the fall to the after-school program at Temple that everyone is questioning about getting about free rooms without paying. I don’t know what the deal is with that but I can say her foundation provides a good program at low cost. This program has helped our friend’s autistic son achieve better grades you can’t beat that.

Hope you can talk to Ted very soon.

Post new comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. If you don't know the answer, refresh (press F5) and a new question may appear.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Share This

Bookmark and Share